A statement issued following a tribal gathering confirmed the tribes' backing for all initiatives aimed at ending the Houthi militia's coup and reinstating the government. The gathering called upon national forces to set aside differences and unify their ranks against the Houthi agenda.

The statement emphasized the critical role of the military institution in defending the nation's sovereignty and confronting Houthi escalation, which it described as Iranian interventions aimed at transforming Yemen into a base for threatening international navigation and the security of neighboring countries.

Participants in the gathering urged the Presidential Leadership Council and the government to expedite the necessary procedures for operating Al-Mokha International Airport. They highlighted its importance as a vital gateway for alleviating citizen suffering and fostering civilian movement in liberated areas.

The statement accused the Houthi militia of causing the closure of Sana'a Airport, asserting that they exploit the suffering of Yemenis as a tool for political blackmail. It further alleged that the militia seeks to obstruct peace efforts and prolong the crisis in the country.

This directive was issued during a meeting with the commander of the Third Brigade of Shabwah Defense and the commander of the Bayhan-Hurayb front, Brigadier General Fawzi Hussein Al-Saadi. Governor Al-Wazir was briefed on the latest military developments, operational progress, and the current state of combat preparedness in the front lines.

Bin Al-Wazir commended the significant sacrifices made by members of the armed forces, acknowledging their vigilance and discipline in repelling attacks launched by Houthi militias. He reiterated the local authority's commitment to providing ongoing logistical and material support to enhance troop efficiency and consolidate security and stability within the governorate.

Brigadier General Fawzi Al-Saadi, in turn, provided an update on field operations, detailing that military units are efficiently carrying out their duties and effectively countering repeated assaults by Houthi militias, including the use of drones. He highlighted the forces' high combat readiness and constant preparedness.

Concluding the meeting, the Shabwah Governor called for intensified training and qualification programs, along with enhanced coordination among various military and security units. This, he emphasized, will further elevate readiness to confront emerging threats, underscoring that the Bayhan-Hurayb front is a strategic theater in the ongoing effort to restore state institutions and safeguard national gains.

The Houthi announcement of a maritime blockade was not an isolated incident but the culmination of a series of deliberate escalatory steps. These began with the militia testing Yemeni airspace by attempting to land Iranian Mahan Air flights at Sana'a Airport without official authorization from the legitimate government. In response to this blatant violation of national sovereignty, the Yemeni Ministry of Defense was compelled to take decisive action by targeting the runway to prevent the Iranian aircraft from landing, an act the militia interpreted as the end of de-escalation.

The militia rapidly extended the conflict to the regional sphere by targeting Abha International Airport with missiles and drones, culminating in the military spokesman's declaration of a naval siege, ostensibly as a reciprocal measure. This progression in escalation reveals that the Houthi militia is no longer content with leveraging humanitarian issues and salaries for blackmail; they are now strategically employing the security of the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb as leverage, primarily serving Iranian objectives to expand regional tensions.

While Saudi Arabia has made significant efforts to advance the peace process and support regional mediation, the Houthi stance has fully mortgaged Yemen's geography and its people's interests to Tehran's agenda, discarding all opportunities for de-escalation and exposing the hollowness of the militia's claims. They sought financial gains and concessions without offering any genuine political or national compromises.

Attention is now focused on Muscat, Oman, where intensive consultations are underway led by the UN envoy, with regional parties involved, to contain the volatile situation. However, Yemeni political and popular circles view any new attempts to forge a fragile settlement based on further concessions to the militia with apprehension and concern. Accepting Houthi blackmail at this critical juncture, and acquiescing to their demands under the guise of bloodshed or humanitarian solutions, would be a direct and fatal blow to the legitimacy of the Presidential Leadership Council and the internationally recognized government.

The Yemeni populace, having endured oppression, poverty, and withheld salaries in Houthi-controlled areas, perceives any official retreat in the face of maritime and aerial threats as complete capitulation. This would irrevocably end any remaining public confidence in the state institutions' ability to protect them, reclaim their rights, or disarm the militia. Regionally, continued submission to Houthi blackmail will not bring peace to Saudi Arabia or the region; instead, it will embolden the militia, granting them time to regroup militarily and upgrade their arsenal of drones and ballistic missiles under direct Iranian sponsorship.

Past experiences have demonstrated that the Houthis exploit periods of calm to maximize their material and political gains without adhering to any commitments. Accepting their terms imposed by force would legitimize an Iranian proxy on Saudi Arabia's borders, capable of choking international navigation, paralyzing regional ports, and targeting vital infrastructure at Tehran's political convenience.

Conversely, a decisive military resolution emerges as the sole strategic and indispensable option for the Arab Coalition, the Presidential Leadership Council, and the international community to put an end to the ongoing Houthi madness. The conflict is no longer merely an internal Yemeni affair but has transformed into a direct global confrontation, given the militia's audacity in declaring the closure of an international waterway crucial for millions of barrels of oil and East-West trade. Ground intelligence indicates that government forces across various fronts, particularly in Tehama, Marib, and Hodeidah, have increased combat readiness and successfully repelled several Houthi naval and land infiltration attempts, reflecting the national readiness for a decisive battle to end this chaos.

The regional and international consensus is stronger than ever that allowing the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to remain under the mercy of an unbridled, ideologically driven militia will have catastrophic consequences for the global economy and energy supplies. Therefore, a comprehensive military resolution, supported by unprecedented international air and naval cover, is the only effective response capable of severing the Iranian arm, securing Yemeni coastlines and ports, and restoring the official state's sovereignty. A synchronized military offensive, coupled with an anticipated popular uprising within Yemen against the militia's policies, represents the genuine and sole path to reintegrate Yemen into its Arab fold, protect Saudi Arabia's national security, and safeguard international navigation from piracy and political blackmail, thereby leading the Houthi militia to its inevitable fate after their self-inflicted downfall due to ignorance, arrogance, and defiance of national and international will.

The military spokesperson for the Houthi movement announced that the decision to ban maritime navigation linked to Saudi Arabia is now in effect, vowing to take action against what they described as Saudi-affiliated targets in the Red Sea. This declaration represents a shift in the militia's rhetoric, which had previously focused on vessels allegedly connected to Israel before extending its threats to Saudi Arabia, a move analysts believe could significantly increase risks to international trade in a critical global waterway.

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is a vital artery for global commerce, facilitating a substantial portion of oil exports and trade between Asia and Europe. Any disruption to its security garners widespread regional and international attention. The Houthi announcement comes at a time of increasing political and military pressure on Iran, including intensified U.S. sanctions and efforts to curtail its economic and military activities, alongside recent tensions surrounding Iranian flights to Sana'a.

Analysts suggest that the timing of this escalation reinforces the perception that the Houthi militia is operating within a wider regional framework, given persistent accusations that Iran uses the Houthis as leverage against its adversaries. The Yemeni government, along with several Western and regional nations, accuses Tehran of providing military and logistical support to the Houthis, an allegation Iran denies, stating its support is solely political.

The Houthi declaration has elicited widespread reactions from Yemeni political and media circles. Many observers view the threat to Saudi shipping originating from Yemeni territory as a precursor to a broader conflict, potentially prompting regional and international responses to protect navigation routes. Security experts warn that targeting Saudi interests or disrupting commercial shipping will likely lead to an increased international military presence in the Red Sea, providing naval powers with further justification to enhance operations aimed at safeguarding commercial vessels and ensuring freedom of navigation.

The Red Sea and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait are among the world's most crucial maritime corridors, through which a considerable volume of global trade and energy supplies transit. Any threat to maritime traffic in this area is a source of concern for international markets and nations reliant on this sea line. In recent years, attacks and threats against commercial vessels have compelled numerous global shipping companies to reroute their ships around the Cape of Good Hope, resulting in increased shipping costs and delays in global supply chains. Observers note that the Houthi blockade announcement signifies the militia's move to a new level of escalation beyond the Yemeni arena, at a time when the Yemeni crisis is increasingly intertwined with regional tensions between Iran and the United States and its allies.

The PTOC Yemen Maritime Security Unit, in a statement dated July 19, 2026, reported receiving "high-risk" security information suggesting a potential operational coordination between Somali pirates and Houthi elements. This collaboration could pave the way for attacks targeting commercial ships and oil tankers.

The potential threats include acts of piracy and hijacking, as well as direct targeting of vessels using fast boats and drones. These activities are anticipated in the Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, and southern Red Sea, particularly around the Bab el-Mandeb strait. Vessels heading to Yemeni ports or transiting near the Yemeni and Somali coastlines are considered at heightened risk.

The unit urged all vessels and maritime shipping companies to enhance their security readiness, immediately implement established ship security plans, and maintain maximum safe distance from Yemeni and Somali coastlines. It also advised against sailing at low speeds in high-risk areas.

Furthermore, prompt reporting of any suspicious movements or approaches to the EUNAVFOR ASPIDES force and relevant maritime authorities was recommended. The warning underscores the necessity of treating this alert with utmost seriousness and adopting all requisite preventive measures to safeguard lives, vessels, and ensure the continued safety of navigation in the region.

This alert comes amid a documented increase in maritime security threats in the waters surrounding Yemen. These concerns are amplified by recent attacks on commercial vessels and growing apprehension regarding the security of international navigation in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, which are vital strategic routes for global trade.

The Yemen Women Empowerment Foundation (YWEF), in its report, stated that the victims were not parties to the conflict but rather employees performing humanitarian, relief, and diplomatic duties. These included workers from UN agencies, relief organizations, civil society organizations, current and former embassy and foreign mission staff, alongside journalists and foreign nationals detained due to their work.

The report indicated that these violations are part of a policy aimed at intimidating the international community, pressuring humanitarian organizations, and restricting the activities of entities operating outside the control of the Iran-backed militia.

The targeting of humanitarian workers has directly impacted civilians, leading to the disruption of relief programs and the reduction of humanitarian operations. This has prompted several international organizations to curtail their activities or scale back their presence in Yemen, despite millions of residents relying on humanitarian aid for survival.

The foundation called upon the United Nations, member states, the Human Rights Council, and relevant international mechanisms to take urgent action to secure the release of all arbitrarily detained individuals, reveal the fate of those forcibly disappeared, and ensure accountability for those responsible for these violations. YWEF emphasized that protecting humanitarian work requires providing a safe environment for its personnel and ending impunity.

The recent trajectory reveals a deliberate obstruction of the detainee and forcibly disappeared file by the Houthi authorities in Sana'a. Despite considerable hope generated by UN and ICRC-mediated understandings for a large-scale prisoner exchange involving over 1,700 individuals, the militia abruptly derailed these efforts at the final stages. This behavior is intrinsically linked to the Houthi's persistent desire to leverage the suffering of thousands of families as a political, military, and economic bargaining chip to alleviate their severe isolation.

Houthi intransigence has manifested in transparent attempts to include individuals implicated in serious criminal offenses and acts of terrorism, unrelated to the ongoing conflict, such as those accused of assassinating prominent military leaders. This tactic has ignited widespread public and tribal discontent within government-controlled areas. Such manipulation of agreed-upon terms and timelines clearly reflects the militia's dwindling options, as they appear to view the continued detention of forcibly disappeared persons and civilian abductees as their last defense against a complete erosion of their legitimacy.

This humanitarian impasse occurs as the Houthi militia faces its most severe military and political decline. Current intelligence, political discourse, and military readiness indicators highlight that the legitimate government now holds the initiative, supported by internal cohesion and extensive logistical and military aid from the Arab coalition and the international community, which has grown weary of Houthi threats to international navigation and the Bab al-Mandab strait. Recent sovereign measures by the legitimate government, including economic sanctions and strict controls on the militia's air and sea supply lines, have stripped the Houthis of the leverage they previously employed in negotiation rounds.

The structural weakness and military exhaustion of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, the primary backer of the militia, render protracted military confrontations nearly impossible for the Houthis. This has compelled their leadership to attempt to salvage their position by sabotaging humanitarian understandings, perhaps believing that holding military leaders, politicians, activists, and forcibly disappeared individuals in their clandestine prisons offers a safety net or a means to extract concessions or economic gains to offset their mounting battlefield losses.

Beyond international isolation and political weakness, the Houthi militia faces an existential threat from within the territories they control, including the capital, Sana'a. The Yemeni populace is experiencing unprecedented levels of discontent and hardship due to systematic impoverishment policies, the non-payment of salaries, and exorbitant taxes levied by the militia to fund their war machine and enrich their ruling elite, while depriving citizens of basic necessities and services. This internal fragmentation, coupled with escalating societal and tribal rejection of their repressive policies, and increasingly arbitrary trials targeting women, activists, and educators, places the militia in a constant defensive posture.

The Houthi's failed handling of the prisoner and forcibly disappeared file further underscores their apprehension regarding any potential breakthrough, which could be perceived as a retreat or defeat by their popular base. Consequently, they favor continued deadlock, awaiting a political miracle that may not materialize amidst rapid international and regional shifts. Observers anticipate complex outcomes for the captive crisis. The legitimate government, operating from a position of genuine strength and approaching the issue from a purely humanitarian perspective that rejects politicization, feels a moral and legal obligation to maintain pressure through all legitimate means to end the suffering of the abductees. Continued Houthi intransigence is likely to prompt the government and coalition to implement more stringent punitive and economic measures targeting the militia's remaining resources, thereby increasing their isolation and accelerating their downfall.

The continued detention of thousands of abductees and forcibly disappeared individuals in secret Houthi prisons, subjected to various forms of torture, presents a critical test for the United Nations and its Special Envoy to demonstrate their commitment and decouple humanitarian progress from military calculations. Mere expressions of concern or passive observation are no longer acceptable when confronting a militia whose power is diminishing daily, yet whose aggression against unarmed civilians intensifies. Breaking the international silence and exploiting the militia's current weakness through decisive, direct international sanctions is the sole path to compelling the Houthis to comply with UN resolutions, empty their detention centers, and restore hope to thousands of Yemeni families awaiting news behind closed doors.

The phrase "For Hessa's eyes, they shall not suckle," originates from a legendary event where Prince Dera'i bin Shaalan of the Anza tribe ordered the slaughter of newborn foals. This drastic measure was intended to ensure the mares were strong enough to fight and restore the honor of Hessa, a woman who had been insulted and her belongings seized. The tribesmen, upholding their code of honor, complied, making the phrase a symbol of their unwavering commitment to defending a wronged individual.

The story of Hessa is set against the backdrop of a severe drought when the "Al-Amara" tribes of Anza migrated north to the Euphrates River. There, they clashed with the "Shammar" tribe in what became known as the "Battle of Basala." The Anza tribes suffered a defeat, and during the conflict, Hessa bint Al-Hathal, the daughter of the tribe's chief, was insulted, and her camel and possessions were taken. Her desperate cry for help, "Dera'i, my men!", reached Dera'i bin Mashhoor Al-Shaalan, a powerful leader of the Rola and Jalas tribes. Enraged, he swore an oath not to rest until he avenged her honor, initiating the mobilization of tribal forces.

The ensuing general call to arms saw various Anza clans unite. After establishing terms and covenants, they marched to confront the Shammar and their allies at a location known as "Al-Subaikha" (or Afar). The battle raged for approximately 90 days, culminating in a decisive victory for the Anza tribe under Dera'i's command. Hessa bint Al-Hathal was returned with her dignity intact, along with her belongings, including her camel litter named "Al-Amariya." This historical event, known as "Hessa's Cry," which occurred in 1824, is celebrated as a testament to the tribal commitment to protecting honor and upholding chivalry.

The article draws a parallel between these historical precedents and the current situation, where a woman, Sheikh Hamad bin Fadgham, and his associate have reportedly been detained and subjected to mistreatment. The author highlights that a woman's act of throwing her hair among men is a grave appeal, placing her honor in their collective charge, and failure to respond incurs severe disgrace. The ongoing tribal mobilization in Al-Jawf, in support of Sheikh Hamad bin Fadgham and his associate, stands in stark contrast to what is described as the "Houthi stance," characterized by a lack of equitable response and continued mobilization for confrontation, seemingly disregarding the deep-rooted tribal customs.

Furthermore, the article criticizes the Houthi leadership's rhetoric, accusing them of fabricating narratives of victimhood and starvation to justify their actions and to manipulate public opinion, particularly in relation to their calls for support towards Iran. This strategy is likened to the Arabic proverb, "She blamed me with her ailment and then slipped away." The author contends that the Houthis consistently employ misdirection and delay tactics, citing their use of mediation in the current crisis as a tactic to "buy time," reminiscent of their actions in August 2017, where they allegedly exploited peace talks as a cover for betrayal and strategic repositioning.

The true test, the article posits, lies not only in asserting air sovereignty against perceived Iranian and Houthi incursions, exemplified by the successful redirection of a Mahan Air flight, but in the broader project of restoring complete national sovereignty. The government's firm resolve and extensive preparations are seen as crucial in defeating what is described as the "Iranian project" embodied by the Houthi coup.

In conclusion, the article emphasizes the convergence of tribal and state efforts. With multiple factions united, the expectation is that decisive action will be taken to avenge the wronged and reclaim stolen rights within Houthi-controlled territories. The prevailing sentiment is one of anticipation for a serious and conclusive decision, leading to a unified national battle where victory is the only acceptable outcome.

The military media wing of the National Resistance reported that its units detected movements by Houthi militia gunmen in front of the positions of the 14th Infantry Brigade in the Jabal Dhabas sector. The resistance forces engaged and directly clashed with the militants.

The clashes concluded with the Houthi elements being forced to retreat and flee the area after sustaining direct casualties. The National Resistance did not provide a specific toll of the losses.

The southern Hodeidah fronts periodically witness intermittent confrontations, with ongoing infiltration attempts and reciprocal shelling between the Joint Forces and the Houthi militia. This occurs despite the UN-brokered truce, which has reduced the intensity of military operations compared to previous years.

Local sources reported that the Houthi leader, Faris Rub'a, oversaw a campaign aimed at seizing control of the cemetery located in Wadi Ja'irah, Al-Salafiyah district. The victim, Fatima Ali Ali Al-Wathn, who has hearing and speech impairments, was reportedly attacked while attempting to prevent the encroachment and demolition.

According to the sources, the Houthi leader's escorts assaulted the woman by striking her with rifle butts before throwing her from a height. This resulted in severe bleeding, leading to her current comatose state. She remains under intensive care at a hospital in Ma'bar, with her health condition reportedly deteriorating.

The incident followed a series of abductions carried out by the militia, targeting the victim's husband, her brother, and another individual. These detentions were reportedly intended to clear the area and facilitate the excavation of the cemetery using heavy machinery, under heavy guard.

The incident has sparked widespread indignation and anger among the local population, with calls for an investigation into the matter, accountability for those responsible, and an immediate halt to any actions that violate the sanctity of cemeteries or target civilians.

Dr. Baleegh Al-Taweel, director of the National Foundation for Combating Cancer's branch in Ibb, highlighted that the surge is particularly acute in rural areas. He attributed the alarming rise to severe environmental factors, including the contamination of groundwater sources, the indiscriminate use of banned and carcinogenic agricultural pesticides, and a general lack of health awareness and regulatory oversight on agricultural chemicals.

Al-Taweel expressed grave concern over the increasing prevalence of the disease among younger populations, including youth and children. He cautioned that without immediate and substantial intervention from relevant authorities and international organizations, the number of cases and fatalities is projected to rise uncontrollably.

Ibb Governorate, one of Yemen's most densely populated regions, is grappling with a severe deficit in its healthcare sector. The National Foundation for Combating Cancer currently records over 7,780 registered cancer cases. This situation is exacerbated by a critical shortage of chemotherapy drugs and the non-operational status of radiotherapy equipment, leaving thousands of patients facing life-threatening delays in treatment.

The Foundation has appealed to all humanitarian organizations and the international community for urgent support to save cancer patients in Ibb. The appeal emphasizes the critical need for medical supplies and therapeutic doses to avert further loss of life.

Local sources confirmed that the Houthi militia launched a projectile from an unmanned aerial vehicle, striking the residence of citizen Sulaiman Yahya Mushal Al-Haimi, aged 70. The attack occurred in his hometown of Beit Al-Haimi village, north of the district center.

The assault resulted in the elderly citizen sustaining an injury to his hand. He was subsequently transported to a field hospital in Al-Khawkhah for medical treatment. The shelling also caused the death of a camel and inflicted material damage to the citizen's property.

Flight tracking data indicated that the Airbus A340-313, registered EP-MMC, departed from Imam Khomeini International Airport in Tehran under flight number IRM1199 (W51199). However, the aircraft altered its route and returned to Iran without completing its intended journey.

This incident occurs amidst heightened tensions regarding Iranian flights to Sanaa. The Yemeni government has previously stated its refusal to accept any flights that do not adhere to official channels and secure approval from the competent authorities.

Earlier, the Yemeni Ministry of Defense announced an operation targeting the runway at Sanaa Airport, asserting that the measure was taken to prevent the landing of the Iranian aircraft. The ministry also urged civilians to stay clear of the airport vicinity for their safety.

The ministry accused the Houthi militia of obstructing the operation of Yemeni national carrier flights while permitting Iranian aircraft to utilize airspace and airports under their control. This action was deemed a violation of Yemeni sovereignty.

The flight also coincided with the Houthi militia's rejection of a Jordanian initiative to operate flights from Queen Alia International Airport to Sanaa, a move welcomed by the Yemeni government. The militia's insistence on facilitating Iranian flights suggests a military, rather than solely humanitarian, objective.

The same aircraft had previously arrived at Sanaa Airport approximately two weeks prior, departing for Tehran with a Houthi delegation on board. That flight generated considerable controversy and drew objections from the Yemeni government concerning its operational procedures.

Local and military sources stated that armed individuals attacked members of the unit, affiliated with the Fourth Brigade, while they were having dinner in the Rumaah district market. The attack resulted in the deaths of at least four soldiers and injuries to several others. This initial toll may rise as casualty figures are finalized.

Preliminary information indicates that among the deceased was the son of the Fourth Brigade's Chief of Staff, known as "Al-Basht Al-Subaihi," along with three other soldiers. The injured were transported to health centers for treatment.

Local sources have linked the attack to tribal tensions that followed an incident last week. During that incident, a member of the Nauf Dahm tribe was killed during an altercation with members of a Fourth Brigade security checkpoint. He was accused of throwing a hand grenade while attempting to apprehend him, leading to his pursuit and death. This event escalated tensions in the area.

Independent verification of the motive behind the attack could not be obtained. No official statement has been issued by the "Shield of the Homeland" forces or the local authorities in Hadramaut to clarify the circumstances or identify the perpetrators. No group has claimed responsibility for the operation to date.

The Rumaah district is situated on the vital route connecting Hadramaut and Marib governorates and experiences frequent security and military presence due to its desert location. Some eastern regions of Yemen periodically witness attacks targeting military and security formations amidst ongoing security challenges facing the country.

The rescue operations took place at various locations along the coastlines of Mukalla city and the Shihr coast. In one incident, rescue teams intervened to save an elderly man and a child, identified as father and son from outside the governorate, at Al-Sitteen Beach. Both were stabilized and safely brought ashore in a stable health condition.

Further rescues included a man from outside the governorate at Al-Sitteen Beach in Mukalla, who received immediate on-site medical assistance and is reported to be in stable condition. In a separate event, a local resident of Hadramout was rescued at the Shihr Corniche after encountering difficulties while swimming. Initial first aid was administered at the scene, and his health has since stabilized.

The Hadramout Coast Guard command has intensified its warnings to beachgoers, emphasizing that the sea during the Al-Balda star season is prone to sudden shifts and strong undertows that pose a significant danger, even to experienced swimmers.

Authorities are urging citizens and visitors to strictly adhere to safety guidelines. They advise against swimming in undesignated areas or locations far from rescue teams, and to avoid venturing into deep waters regardless of apparent calm. The command stressed that underestimating the sea's dangers can lead to tragic accidents.

The Coast Guard also implored parents to supervise children closely and prevent them from being unattended near water. They recommended avoiding solo swimming or swimming during periods of strong currents, assuring the public that their teams are deployed along the entire coastline and are on high alert. Prevention, they reiterated, remains the most crucial measure for safeguarding lives.

Local sources reported that Dr. Mohammed Dabwan, a cardiologist who has worked at the hospital for years, was attacked on Thursday. The incident occurred when he attempted to enter the hospital through the patient entrance, rather than a recently designated employee gate established by Houthi security management.

According to the sources, Houthi guards prevented Dr. Dabwan from entering and proceeded to assault him in a manner described as humiliating, despite his long-standing role as a staff member.

The sources further indicated that Houthi security forces have recently implemented new procedures separating employee and patient entrances. These guards have reportedly treated hospital staff with disrespect, even as many doctors and healthcare professionals continue to work extended hours amidst unpaid salaries.

The incident has provoked strong reactions within the medical community. Activists and doctors are demanding an urgent investigation into the assault, prosecution of those responsible, and the enactment of legislation to protect medical personnel from attacks while performing their duties.

This event is part of a pattern of violations by the Houthi militia against the healthcare sector in areas under their control. The militia faces persistent accusations of undermining the operations of government hospitals, interfering in their management, and exerting influence over public and private health institutions, exacerbating the deterioration of medical services and the hardships faced by healthcare workers.

The Regional Maritime Information Exchange Center in Aden, affiliated with the General Authority of Maritime Affairs, reported the incident. Ship tracking systems detected a sudden change in the tanker's course following the attack, with the vessel heading towards the Somali coast, specifically near the port of Bosaso in the Puntland region.

The tanker, which sails under the Tanzanian flag and bears the International Maritime Organization (IMO) number 9035838, was attacked approximately 65 nautical miles southeast of the city of Mukalla while transiting an international shipping lane. The seizure of the vessel reportedly followed the boarding of armed individuals suspected of belonging to maritime piracy groups.

The tanker issued a distress call immediately after the attack. It is noteworthy that the vessel was not carrying an armed security team at the time of the incident, which may have facilitated the targeting. This region is classified as high-risk for maritime operations.

The tanker remains under the control of the assailants. Regional and international efforts are currently underway, utilizing specialized maritime and intelligence channels, to ascertain the condition of the crew members and ensure their safety.

In Bahrain, the Ministry of Interior announced the activation of air raid sirens across the Kingdom, urging citizens and residents to remain calm and proceed to the nearest safe location. The ministry issued a brief statement via its official account, encouraging everyone to follow updates through official channels.

In Kuwait, the Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) reported the sounding of air raid sirens nationwide, coinciding with the air defense forces intercepting missile and drone attacks. The Kuwaiti Army General Staff confirmed that air defense systems are currently engaging incoming missile and drone threats, stating that the attacks followed "Iranian aggression."

The Kuwaiti Army indicated that any explosions heard in certain areas are a result of interception operations conducted by air defense systems against hostile targets. The General Staff urged citizens and residents to adhere to safety instructions issued by relevant authorities and to follow guidance and updates through official channels.

This escalation occurs concurrently with the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announcing the commencement of a new wave of military strikes against Iran, emphasizing that the operations aim to "further degrade Iran's military capabilities."

Informed sources revealed that the militia has raised the readiness level in areas under its control and initiated a security alert in the streets of the capital, Sana'a. This includes the establishment of additional checkpoints and the intensification of inspection and security measures for citizens.

According to the sources, these movements are driven by the militia's concerns over potential battlefield developments. The escalation of military tension and the possibility of new confrontations across several fronts are compounded by ongoing Houthi mobilization efforts.

This situation unfolds as tribal gatherings in the Al Rayyan area of Khab and Ash Sha'af district in Al Jawf governorate enter their fourth week. These gatherings are in response to a call for mobilization issued by Sheikh Hamad bin Rashid bin Fudgham Al Hazmi Al Dahmi. Tribal delegations continue to arrive from various governorates, citing the Houthi militia's intransigence and refusal to address the legitimate demands put forth by the Yemeni tribes.

CENTCOM stated in a release that US forces began executing this latest round of strikes at 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on Thursday. This follows the conclusion of a previous strike wave that occurred on Wednesday evening and lasted until 9:00 PM EST.

The command detailed that the recent strikes targeted military command centers, air defense sites, missile systems, drone capabilities, and coastal surveillance facilities across multiple locations within Iran, including the city of Bandar Abbas. These operations utilized precision-guided munitions.

CENTCOM clarified that the military operations are intended to "continue to degrade Iran's ability to threaten innocent mariners operating on commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz," amidst escalating regional tensions.

The command also noted that US forces conducted an earlier wave of strikes on Thursday morning, lasting approximately 90 minutes, which targeted coastal defense sites and cruise missile platforms on Greater Tunb Island.

CENTCOM affirmed that the US military continues to conduct these operations "under the direction of the Commander-in-Chief," framing them as holding Iran accountable for its threats to navigation and regional security.

These strikes occur within a context of ongoing military escalation between the United States and Iran, amid international concerns regarding the potential expansion of the conflict and its impact on maritime security and energy supplies in the Gulf region.

The agreement was notably concluded between donor entities and a UN organization, with the attendance of Saudi and British officials, while the Yemeni government, represented by its Council of Ministers, Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation, and relevant ministries, was entirely absent. This absence suggests a disregard for its authority and its position as the sovereign state where these projects are to be executed.

This pattern of exclusion is no longer an anomaly but has become a recurring approach in most humanitarian and development agreements related to Yemen. This reflects a dangerous erosion of the legitimate government's standing, transforming it from an authority meant to manage state affairs into a spectator to agreements concerning its people and land, made without its participation or signature.

Observers contend that this situation transcends a mere protocol breach, signifying a practical concession of a fundamental aspect of national sovereignty. The management of aid and development programs within any nation falls squarely within the purview of its government. However, in Yemen, this role is increasingly being fulfilled through direct arrangements between donors and international organizations, a scenario that entrenches the marginalization of state institutions and undermines their legitimacy.

Experts assert that the government's continued acceptance of this model effectively means relinquishing a portion of its sovereign powers to external parties. It allows for the management of internal affairs impacting millions of Yemenis to occur outside state institutions, progressively diminishing the government's role as the national reference point for planning, oversight, and regulation.

Furthermore, bypassing the government in the signing of these agreements negates the principle of "national ownership" that underpins international partnerships. It raises critical questions regarding the reasons for the legitimate authority's acceptance of a nominal role, while external entities dictate project priorities, manage funding, and oversee implementation without substantive governmental involvement.

Despite the significance of Saudi and British support and the humanitarian role played by the World Food Programme in alleviating Yemeni suffering, the persistent exclusion of the government from agreements pertaining to its own country sends negative signals about the state and its institutions. It reinforces the perception that decisions regarding aid and development programs are no longer made within Yemeni institutions but are managed externally. This situation prompts profound questions about the future of national sovereignty and the role of the legitimate government itself.

The foundation announced that its field teams are distributing financial allocations to beneficiaries in Al-Mahra, Al-Dhale'e, Marib, and Wadi Hadramaut. This initiative is being carried out under the directives of the foundation's Chairman, Ahmed Ali Abdullah Saleh.

The project's initial phase targets 1050 orphans in the liberated governorates, with 100 orphans designated for each governorate. These children have lost their primary breadwinners due to ongoing conflict. The monthly sponsorship program is designed to provide consistent financial support to the recipient families.

The foundation stated that prior to the commencement of disbursements, comprehensive field surveys and eligibility verifications were completed to ensure aid reaches the intended recipients. The targeted governorates include Aden, Taiz, Hodeidah, Lahj, Abyan, Shabwah, Marib, Al-Mahra, Al-Dhale'e, Socotra, as well as the coastal and inland regions of Hadramaut.

This project underscores the foundation's ongoing commitment to orphan care and the enhancement of social protection measures. Its objective is to alleviate the burdens faced by families who have lost their providers and to improve the living conditions and stability for the children benefiting from the program.

Yahya Kozman, the deputy head of the government's negotiating delegation, denied the validity of statements made by Abdul Qadir Al-Murtada, head of the Houthi committee, attributing the alleged reasons for the deal's collapse to fabrications. Kozman emphasized that the Houthi militia is the party that obstructed the agreement's execution.

Kozman detailed that the Houthi militia, through the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), requested a postponement of the exchange operation. Furthermore, they prevented the completion of logistical arrangements for the scheduled flights, including the detention of an ICRC aircraft at Sana'a Airport.

He affirmed that the government side has fulfilled all its obligations stipulated in the agreement and completed the necessary procedures for its implementation. Kozman squarely placed the responsibility for the deal's failure and the continued suffering of detainees and their families on the Houthi militia.

Kozman urged the Houthi militia to commit to implementing the agreed-upon deal without delay or employing the issue for political blackmail, thereby ensuring the release of detainees and ending the suffering of their families.

The ascension of Ali Abdullah Saleh to power in the Yemen Arab Republic (North Yemen) was not merely a change in leadership but the inauguration of a new chapter. His tenure began amidst a volatile political landscape marked by assassinations and coups, including the murders of two consecutive presidents, Ibrahim Al-Hamdi and Ahmed Al-Ghashmi, within a single year. Saleh's rise, facilitated through the Constituent People's Assembly, was seen as a national salvation, aimed at stabilizing the nascent republic.

Upon assuming office, President Saleh's initial priorities were to unify the internal front, fortify state institutions, and ensure the security of the capital. He succeeded in transforming the concept of governance from one of individual rule and disarray to a system based on institutional stability. This involved restoring the prestige of military and civil institutions and fostering a political vision centered on dialogue and the inclusion of national forces in decision-making processes.

Recognizing that lasting stability required more than just security measures, President Saleh championed the creation of a national framework. The National Charter, drafted in 1982 by Yemeni elites from various national factions and approved through a referendum, served as an intellectual and theoretical guide. This was followed by the establishment of the General People's Congress in August 1982, conceived not as a narrow ideological party but as a broad national organization fostering dialogue and consensus. This structure became the bedrock for Yemen's nascent political pluralism, contributing to the eventual unification of Yemen and positioning the country as a leader among Arab nations in embracing emerging democracy, press freedom, and peaceful transitions of power.

Furthermore, Yemen's foreign policy under Saleh evolved to emphasize balance, positive neutrality, and good neighborliness. The nation successfully resolved complex border disputes through peaceful and legal means, signing final border demarcation agreements with Oman and Saudi Arabia. Yemen also reasserted its full sovereignty over the Hanish Islands in the Red Sea by appealing to the International Court of Arbitration, underscoring its commitment to international law and regional security.

History necessitates an appreciation of July 17, 1978, as the commencement of an era of stability and institutional development. Yemenis today reflect on this period, drawing lessons from Saleh's leadership, emphasizing wisdom, dialogue, and the construction of an inclusive national state as the definitive path to restoring Yemen's lost security and stability.

An informed source disclosed on Wednesday that individuals involved in these aggressions are continuing to pour concrete, erect columns, and bring construction materials through the headquarters' main entrance.

The source further indicated that the construction activities remain ongoing, characterizing them as an assault on the General People's Congress headquarters. The source urged immediate action to halt what were described as "transgressions" and to protect the premises.

The source appealed to the leaders and members of the General People's Congress to follow up on the issue and take action to stop the construction work. Additionally, the source called upon the local authority in Taiz Governorate to intervene swiftly and implement necessary measures to halt the ongoing activities, preserve the headquarters, and prevent any unauthorized modifications within it.

The advent of July 17th ushered in a new era focused on state construction, the consolidation of its institutions, the supremacy of law, and the revitalization of the republican concept. The path was arduous and fraught with challenges and dangers, yet the leadership successfully transitioned Yemen from crisis management to stability creation, defining the contours of a national project that, for decades, served as a unifying framework for Yemenis across their diverse affiliations.

Over thirty-three years, Yemen witnessed significant transformations across various sectors. The network of roads, airports, and ports expanded, and electricity, telecommunications, and education services reached extensive areas. The oil and gas sector experienced its true launch, the Marib Dam was rebuilt, and investments and development aid flowed in, all while the state solidified its presence across governorates.

Politically, Yemen engaged in a pluralistic and democratic experiment considered among the most prominent in the region, characterized by parliamentary, presidential, and local elections, the presence of partisan and independent media, and a political life marked by peaceful competition, despite accompanying challenges. Externally, Yemen pursued a balanced policy that preserved its national decision-making independence, fostering balanced relations with its Arab, regional, and international surroundings without compromising its national and pan-Arab principles.

The most significant achievement of that era remains the realization of Yemeni unity on May 22, 1990, standing as the greatest national project in modern Yemeni history. This event ended decades of division and laid the foundation for a unified Yemeni state, fulfilling a long-held aspiration of successive generations.

However, the state-building project was not immune to targeted attacks. In subsequent years, it faced escalating political, security, and media pressures that weakened state institutions and plunged the country into a vortex of conflicts and divisions. With the dismantling of many pillars of the state, the Houthi militia found an opportunity to seize and overthrow its institutions in September 2014, ushering Yemen into one of its most tragic phases, characterized by war, division, economic collapse, and an unprecedented humanitarian crisis.

Today, after years of conflict, the comparison between the past and the present is starker than ever. The state that possessed functional institutions, a unified army, and sovereignty over its decisions has devolved into a reality burdened by division, multiple authorities, declining services, and ongoing war.

The commemoration of July 17th is not merely an occasion to celebrate the past but an opportunity to recall the value of the national state and the importance of preserving its institutions. It reminds Yemenis that nations are built not on slogans but on institutions, stability, and national partnership, and that Yemen's recovery begins with the restoration of its state, sovereignty, unity, and the encompassing national project that for many years symbolized stability and development.

Educators have noted that approximately 70% of students reportedly achieved "very good" or higher grades, a figure considered unrealistic given the deteriorating educational conditions in these regions. Schools are reportedly suffering from staff shortages, and the militia has allegedly repurposed educational institutions for ideological indoctrination, while essential textbooks are scarce.

A prominent concern among educators is the awarding of high grades to students known for poor academic performance and inconsistent school attendance, often only appearing for examinations. Conversely, academically gifted students, who have excelled since primary school, have reportedly received unexpectedly low scores that do not reflect their true capabilities.

Specialists and observers suggest this situation is a deliberate policy by the Houthi-affiliated "Ministry of Education." The apparent objectives include appeasing public discontent by inflating pass rates and rewarding students recruited for combat on the front lines who attended classes sporadically.

Educators and observers warn that the continuation of such practices could devastate the remaining educational infrastructure in Houthi-controlled territories, undermine the principles of equal opportunity and educational justice, and lead to significant psychological distress among high-achieving students whose efforts are not being fairly recognized.

One parent shared a poignant account: "My nephew was among the top students from the first grade of primary school through the second year of secondary school. He took his final exams confident in his answers, expecting a score of at least 90%. However, we were shocked to receive a result of 64%. He remains stunned and disbelieving. God will suffice us and is the best disposer of affairs for you, Education Office. I know the reason but fear the consequences if I speak."

Educators and parents are calling for the formation of an independent committee to review this year's results and ensure that such illegal and irregular procedures, described as a systematic destruction of future generations' potential, are not repeated.

The incident involving the Iranian aircraft, which was compelled to land in Hodeidah, was not a mere isolated event. It represented a clear Houthi declaration of intent to breach Yemeni sovereignty and impose a fait accompli serving a specific agenda. This blatant challenge prompted a firm response from Yemen's legitimate government, supported regionally and pressured internationally. President Rashad al-Alimi stated that the state's patience had run out and that the targeting of the airport was a defensive measure to reject the legitimization of Iranian encroachment.

This stance signals a fundamental shift in the legitimacy's political approach, moving from absorbing provocations to direct deterrence, according to observers and political analysts. The concurrent field escalations in Yemen have coincided with what have been described as the most severe and impactful American and regional strikes deep within Iran's territory.

Military analysts suggest that recent Houthi missile and drone attacks on neighboring areas are not indicative of strength, but rather desperate attempts to alleviate international pressure on Tehran. As the central command structure weakens, the Houthi elements are experiencing military panic and confusion, diminishing their capacity for prolonged maneuvering, especially with renewed financial and maritime sanctions targeting their funding networks and illicit operations.

For years, the international community and the United Nations advocated for extending truces and negotiating peace agreements, from Stockholm to Muscat. However, the Houthi militia exploited these periods for regrouping, fortifying positions, and recruiting child soldiers.

Today, with the militia's direct threat to international shipping lanes in the Red Sea and its targeting of civilian airports, those diplomatic illusions have dissipated. Major capitals, led by Washington, which has reportedly granted approval for broader military actions, now recognize that militarily dismantling the militia's project is the sole sustainable path to securing global trade routes and restoring Yemeni sovereignty.

Current field and political indicators suggest the region is on the brink of a comprehensive military phase, distinct from previous engagements. The Yemeni armed forces are enhancing their combat readiness across various fronts, benefiting from international backing against Houthi aggression and from Iran's diminished logistical support due to targeted strikes. All indications point to the Houthi reliance on resilience being a losing proposition; historical precedent suggests that the extremities inevitably falter after the core is destabilized. Many political and military forecasts anticipate Yemen's eventual return to its authentic Arab sphere, propelled by a national consciousness rejecting dependency and foreign influence.

The sources indicated that armed assailants set up an ambush for Sheikh Al-Salahi's convoy as it passed through the area. The attack led to the martyrdom of his son and an escort identified as Ali Salim. The circumstances surrounding the incident and the identity of the perpetrators remain unclear.

This assassination attempt occurred less than a day after Sheikh Hussein Al-Salahi delivered a public address at Matareh Al-Karama, where he issued strong criticisms against the Brotherhood organization. He accused them of attempting to capitalize on tribal efforts and exploit the tribal mobilization for political gain. Sheikh Al-Salahi was also among the first tribal leaders to respond to the call by Sheikh Hamad bin Fedgham bin Rashed Al-Hazmi to participate in the tribal gathering at Matareh Al-Karama.

Within tribal circles, there are prevailing theories linking the ambush to Sheikh Al-Salahi's stances in support of tribal mobilization. Speculation suggests that elements associated with the Brotherhood organization or the Houthi militia might be behind the attack. However, these theories are unconfirmed, and no group has claimed responsibility for the operation. Official investigation results identifying the perpetrators have not yet been released.

The incident has generated widespread reactions among tribal communities, with calls for an urgent investigation to uncover the details of the attack, identify those responsible, and bring them to justice.

The minister's official statement detailed that the Houthi militia has rejected all peace initiatives and broken covenants, resulting in the deaths and injuries of over a million citizens and the displacement of millions. The group is also responsible for planting approximately one million landmines, bombing mosques, and embezzling employee salaries, alongside systematic efforts to alter Yemeni ideology, distort educational curricula, and erode national identity.

In the context of ideological confrontation, the Minister of Endowments issued an urgent call to preachers, guides, and imams across Yemen. He requested that Friday sermons next week focus on the dangers of the Houthi distortion of societal beliefs, the erosion of authentic Arab identity, and attempts to impose a Persian identity through force.

The Minister of Endowments and Guidance urged Yemenis to rise above internal differences and unite with the legitimate government to restore the state and establish stability.

Local sources reported that intense clashes erupted between security forces and the attackers following the raid. Initial reports indicate that several soldiers were killed in the incident.

The sources further stated that the assailants managed to breach the security compound, and sporadic fighting continues in the vicinity of the location.

The circumstances surrounding the attack and the full extent of casualties remain unclear at this time. The identities of the attackers have not been definitively established, though speculation suggests possible links to the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda. Official statements regarding the incident have not yet been released.

During an emergency session convened at Yemen's request, Yemen's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Abdullah Al-Saadi, stated that the Iranian flights constitute not merely a breach of aviation procedures but a direct challenge to Security Council resolutions and a subversion of Yemeni state sovereignty. He called upon the Council to address this issue as a matter impacting the credibility of the international legal system.

Ambassador Al-Saadi revealed that the Yemeni government possesses information and evidence suggesting that at least one flight was not exclusively for civilian purposes. According to this intelligence, the flight was allegedly used to transport individuals, expertise, and equipment with military or dual-use applications. He confirmed that these findings will be submitted to the International Sanctions Committee and the Panel of Experts on Yemen for investigation and appropriate action.

The Yemeni Ambassador specifically accused Iran's Mahan Air of operating flights to Sanaa Airport outside the approval framework of the legitimate Yemeni government. He cautioned that permitting such activities opens avenues for the use of airports and civilian facilities for purposes contrary to UN resolutions, potentially setting a precedent that could be exploited by armed groups in other conflict zones.

Al-Saadi emphasized that the Yemeni government does not view Sanaa Airport as a political bargaining chip but as a public facility that should remain operational for civilian services under legal guidelines. He noted that the government has supported the continuation of humanitarian and civilian flights when necessary guarantees were in place. However, he asserted that the Houthi militia has persisted in operating unauthorized flights with Iranian support despite official objections.

He further stated that the government has implemented measures to protect its airspace but has deliberately avoided actions that could endanger civilians or expand the conflict. Al-Saadi reiterated Yemen's commitment to a political settlement, contrasting it with accusations that the Houthi militia is undermining peace efforts and reneging on their commitments, including prisoner exchange agreements.

Ambassador Al-Saadi called on the Security Council to condemn the unauthorized Iranian flights and to compel Tehran to cease all flights to Yemeni airports without the consent of the internationally recognized government. He also urged the Council to task the Sanctions Committee and the Panel of Experts with investigating the extent to which these flights violate Council resolutions and to strengthen measures aimed at preventing the smuggling of weapons and experts to the Houthi militia.

The official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) quoted Colonel Turki Al-Maliki, the spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition, confirming that the Royal Saudi Air Force engaged and neutralized the ballistic missile threat. The missiles were fired by what the coalition described as "terrorist Houthi militias."

Local sources in Yemen reported that the Houthi militia launched ballistic missiles from a location in the Sahar district of Sa'dah Governorate, with Saudi Arabia as the intended target.

This incident follows reports of a Mahan Air flight departing from Al Hudaydah airport. The aircraft had reportedly transported a Houthi delegation that had traveled to Tehran. Earlier, government forces had prevented the same aircraft from landing in Sana'a by targeting the runway of Sana'a International Airport.

A circular from the authority, numbered 01-2026 and addressed to all airlines and international organizations operating flights to and from Yemeni airports, stated that all airports are closed to air traffic until further notice, with immediate effect.

This closure follows airstrikes reportedly carried out by the Yemeni government's Ministry of Defense on Sana'a International Airport. The Ministry of Defense stated that the strikes were conducted to prevent the landing of an Iranian aircraft. However, the Iranian plane reportedly diverted its course and landed at Hodeidah Airport.

The Ministry of Defense had previously called for the evacuation of Sana'a Airport and issued warnings regarding the continued flight of the Iranian aircraft. The Minister of Defense had affirmed that the Yemeni Armed Forces would confront any hostile aerial violations with all available means.

The sources indicated that Al-Ans's last known activity on his social media accounts was approximately 17 hours prior to his abduction. No statement has been issued by the militia regarding his whereabouts or condition.

Khalid Al-Ans is recognized for his sharp critical commentary and his advocacy for human rights issues, frequently highlighting citizen grievances, particularly within the Ibb province.

His most recent publication was a video detailing the case of an elderly resident whose home was allegedly seized by influential Houthi figures. Al-Ans called for justice and the restoration of the individual's rights.

This is not the first instance of Al-Ans being detained by Houthi forces; he has been arrested and imprisoned by the militia on multiple occasions without legal justification due to his human rights advocacy.

The syndicate emphasized that Ghalib's continued detention and denial of treatment constitute a flagrant violation of human rights, domestic laws, and international conventions. This situation poses a real threat to his life, making the Houthi militias fully responsible for his well-being and any health decline resulting from his prolonged detention and lack of medical attention.

The syndicate reiterated its call for the immediate and unconditional release of Walid Ali Ghalib. It also urged an end to the systematic targeting of media professionals for carrying out their journalistic duties.

Furthermore, the syndicate appealed to the International Federation of Journalists and the Arab Journalists Association to intensify their efforts and take urgent action with relevant authorities. They called for the application of all possible pressure to secure Ghalib's release and ensure he receives comprehensive medical care until that occurs.

In a memorandum addressed to the Director of the Education Office in Taiz, Abdul Wasea Shaddad, the union stated that over 10,000 teachers and educational staff have not benefited from Cabinet Resolution No. (14) of 2026. This resolution mandates the disbursement of annual bonuses and a 20% increase in the cost of living allowance.

The union detailed that 5,109 teachers were transferred to social security without their consent, despite continuing their teaching duties. This action has resulted in them being deprived of bonuses for the years 2021 and 2025. Furthermore, 1,337 teachers have been denied supplementary bonuses related to the implementation of bonuses for the years 2014 and 2020.

The union highlighted that this group will also be negatively impacted by the cost of living allowance increase. This comes at a time when teachers in other governorates have reportedly received their dues retroactively, while teachers in Taiz remain excluded.

Additionally, the memorandum pointed out that 5,623 educational staff appointed in 2011 have yet to receive their bonuses for 2012 and 2013, along with a job nature allowance, despite repeated appeals from the union and the Education Office.

The Teachers Union urged the elevation of these issues to the state leadership and government to find urgent solutions that ensure the payment of outstanding financial rights and achieve justice for educators. The union cautioned that continued disregard for these demands could compel a significant number of educational cadres to leave their positions, adversely affecting the educational process in the governorate.

Abdulaziz Sultan Saeed, the head of the Yemeni Teachers Union in Taiz, emphasized the imperative to expedite the resolution of these matters and secure fairness for teachers and educational staff. This action, he stated, is crucial for maintaining the stability of the education sector and ensuring the smooth commencement of the new academic year.

Local sources indicate that Houthi supervisors instructed community leaders in the center of Al-Hada district to monitor specific young men suspected of involvement in writing phrases demanding the group's departure, including one slogan that read: "Leave.. we are tired of your deception." This message appeared on a road before Houthi elements removed it.

The sources further clarified that this escalation occurred days after the group abducted five young men in early July, transferring them to one of its prisons in Dhamar city. Among those detained were three members of the Al-Ghuwaibi family, while the other two young men hail from the Al-Azizi and Al-Aawaj families.

According to the sources, the pursuit operations are concentrated in the Bani Ziyad, Al-Milh, and Al-Jarsha areas. The militia has intensified surveillance and search efforts for the suspected individuals, concurrently with actions by its elements to remove anti-Houthi slogans and graffiti that appear on roads and walls shortly after they are written.

These measures are part of the Houthi group's ongoing efforts to suppress dissenting voices and quell manifestations of popular rejection in areas under their control, amidst growing public discontent with their security and political practices.

The sources indicated that tax collection campaigns began in the Al-Nadara and As-Suddah districts before extending to Ibb city, the governorate's center. Committees affiliated with the Public Works Office and the Environmental Health Department, accompanied by armed elements, are conducting field operations in markets and businesses. These operations aim to extract funds under the guise of addressing violations and regulatory requirements.

Traders have reportedly lodged repeated complaints with local authorities under Houthi control, protesting what they describe as arbitrary practices. They emphasize that the new levies exacerbate their financial burdens amid a downturn in commercial activity and weakened purchasing power due to the ongoing economic crisis in the governorate.

According to sources, these campaigns intensified following the appointment of a new official for the Public Works Office in the governorate, who hails from Amran Governorate. The committees have reportedly increased inspection measures and issued citations against several businesses, which traders perceive as a method to impose additional fees and tributes, particularly on small enterprises. The amounts imposed range from 10,000 to 50,000 Yemeni Riyals per establishment, with some cases exceeding 100,000 Riyals, depending on the scale and location of the business.

In a related development, several foodstuff traders from the Yarim, Al-Nadara, and As-Suddah districts told "Khaba" agency that they have faced pressure from Houthi leaders to contribute to funding militia-organized events. This includes providing bottled water and covering the costs of banners and promotional materials for activities, notably an event commemorating the martyrdom of Zayd ibn Ali ibn al-Husayn, which occurred over 1300 years ago.

Academics and educators speaking to the agency suggest that the militia's focus on organizing events with sectarian themes, coupled with financial demands on the commercial sector, reflects a strategy to bolster its ideological discourse within educational and administrative institutions. This occurs while priorities related to improving economic and service conditions are being neglected.

Human rights organizations state that Ibb Governorate has seen a rise in citizen complaints in recent years regarding levies, property seizures, and abuses linked to the exploitation of influence. These organizations are calling on the internationally recognized Yemeni government and the international community to take measures to curb these practices and protect civilians and the private sector from increasing economic pressures.

The sources indicated that tax collection campaigns began in the districts of Al-Nadera and As-Suddah before spreading to Ibb city, the provincial capital. Committees affiliated with the Public Works Office and the Environmental Health Department, accompanied by armed elements, are conducting field campaigns in markets and businesses. These campaigns are levying financial sums under the guise of addressing violations and regulatory requirements.

Traders have reportedly filed repeated complaints to the local authorities under Houthi control, protesting what they describe as arbitrary practices. They emphasize that the new levies exacerbate their financial burdens amid a downturn in commercial activity and weak purchasing power due to the ongoing economic crisis in the province.

According to sources, these campaigns intensified following the appointment of a new official for the Public Works Office in the province, who hails from Amran province. The committees have reportedly increased inspection procedures and issued violations against several businesses, which traders view as a method to impose additional fees and tributes, particularly on small business owners. The imposed amounts range from 10,000 to 50,000 Yemeni riyals per establishment, sometimes exceeding 100,000 riyals, depending on the size and location of the business.

In a related development, several foodstuff traders in the districts of Yarim, Al-Nadera, and As-Suddah told "Khaba" news agency that they have faced pressure from Houthi leaders to contribute financially to events organized by the militia. This includes providing bottled water and covering the costs of banners and promotional materials for activities such as the commemoration of the martyrdom of Zayd ibn Ali ibn al-Husayn, which occurred over 1300 years ago in Kufa, Iraq.

Academics and educators speaking to the agency suggest that the militia's focus on organizing events with sectarian content, coupled with the imposition of financial contributions from the business sector, reflects a strategy to reinforce its ideological narrative within educational and administrative institutions. This occurs while priorities related to improving economic and service conditions are reportedly declining.

Human rights organizations state that Ibb province has seen a rise in citizen complaints in recent years regarding levies, property seizures, and abuses linked to the exploitation of influence. These organizations are calling on the internationally recognized Yemeni government and the international community to take steps to curb these practices and protect civilians and the private sector from increasing economic pressures.

According to security statistics released by the police, the fatalities included one child and one woman, with the remaining victims aged between 18 and 35. Injuries ranged from moderate to severe, primarily affecting individuals between 20 and 40 years old, many of whom required hospitalization.

The statistics indicated that the majority of deaths occurred due to victims mishandling firearms themselves. Two individuals were killed by their siblings, and a third died from a gunshot by someone outside their family. Fifteen incidents resulted from self-inflicted accidents, four were caused by friends of the victims, and two involved a family member.

Police attributed most incidents to celebratory gunfire at weddings and social events, negligent handling of weapons, and violations of firearm regulations and safety protocols. Geographically, Al Dhale and Marib governorates recorded the highest number of incidents with five each, followed by Lahj, Hadramaut Coast, and Shabwah with three each. Hajjah and Al Mahrah saw two incidents apiece, with the remaining distributed across Taiz, Abyan, Hadramaut Valley and Desert, and Al Hudaydah.

Security forces affirmed their commitment to ongoing measures aimed at curbing armed displays and enforcing firearm laws, intensifying surveillance at city entrances, apprehending offenders, and prohibiting celebratory gunfire to protect lives and property.

Citizens were urged to refrain from firing weapons during events and to comply with legal directives concerning firearm possession and use, as these practices pose a direct threat to civilian lives and endanger public safety and security.

Local sources reported that the victim, Shaeif Mansour Al-Hilali, sustained a stab wound to the heart with a traditional dagger. The incident took place at his workplace in the Mofraq Maitam area after a verbal argument escalated into a physical confrontation with an individual over the price of khat.

Al-Hilali was immediately transported to Al-Nisr Hospital but succumbed to his injuries en route. The value of the disputed amount did not exceed 5,000 Yemeni rials, equivalent to approximately 30 US dollars.

The incident has sparked widespread dismay among residents, who expressed shock at the escalating violence and the loss of life over trivial financial disagreements.

The released fishermen have reportedly departed Eritrean territory and are heading towards Al-Khokha district, having completed all necessary release procedures.

Sources indicated that the release was facilitated by mediation efforts undertaken by Yemeni fishermen's representatives, which successfully secured their freedom.

The fishermen had embarked on their routine voyage from the coast of Al-Khokha on April 12th aboard a fishing vessel. Contact was lost shortly thereafter, and it was later confirmed they were being held by Eritrean authorities.

Recent years have seen an increase in incidents involving the detention of Yemeni fishermen while engaged in their work in the Red Sea. This trend highlights sporadic aggressions against fishing boats, including detentions carried out by Eritrean authorities in certain Red Sea littoral states.

Tribal sources reported that the militia has amassed a large number of fighters and vehicles towards Al-Libnat camp, while simultaneously dispatching other forces and machinery towards the Bir Al-Maraziq area. These actions are part of intensified military arrangements aimed at escalating combat operations in the governorate.

According to the sources, the Houthi militia believes that the tribes' preoccupation with the "Matareh Al-Karama" issue in the Al-Rayan region of Al-Jawf Governorate has led to the withdrawal of fighters from the front lines. The militia views this as an opportune moment to launch an attack that could enable them to advance towards the city of Marib.

The sources further indicated that the Houthi reinforcements include new military vehicles and equipment not previously deployed in earlier battles. Some of these, they noted, are still in their original packaging, suggesting the introduction of modern equipment to the operational theater in anticipation of potential confrontations.

Local sources reported that the victim, Abdulmalik Abdullah Al-Ahmadi, 22, originally from the Bani Ahmed area in Al-Jabin district, Reimah Governorate, succumbed to a gunshot wound inflicted by his father after an argument.

Initial information suggests the incident stemmed from the father's removal of his son's wife from the marital home and keeping her away for six months. The son's subsequent decision to bring her back escalated the conflict between father and son.

According to the sources, the father then fired a shot at his son, resulting in his immediate death. The incident has caused widespread shock among the residents of the neighborhood.

The bank's unexpected announcement followed Sheikh Hamad bin Rashid bin Fadgham Al-Hazmi's declaration of opening bank accounts with Al-Karimi to receive financial support and donations for "tribal obligations." These funds were intended for the "Al-Karama gatherings" in Al Jawf Governorate, coinciding with preparations for upcoming battles against the Houthi expansion.

The contentious bank statement issued a stern warning to its clients, emphasizing the need to adhere to the terms and conditions of account opening. It asserted that using accounts for purposes other than their intended use constitutes a violation of regulations and could lead to immediate closure under compliance procedures. Activists and citizens interpreted this as a direct and explicit targeting of accounts supporting Yemeni tribes and the Al Jawf gatherings.

Consequently, widespread calls emerged on social media for a boycott of Al-Karimi Bank and the withdrawal of deposits. Activists and tribal leaders urged the internationally recognized legitimate government and the Central Bank in the interim capital, Aden, to intervene urgently and close the bank's branches in all liberated areas.

Some tribal members have threatened escalating actions against the bank's branches, deeming them as serving the "militias' agenda," should official bodies fail to take decisive steps. Citizens have expressed dismay at the bank's perceived double standards, accusing Al-Karimi's management of facilitating and opening accounts to support the Houthi militia's so-called "war effort" for the past 12 years in areas under their control, without the bank invoking compliance regulations as it did promptly against the Yemeni tribal initiatives.

Local sources reported that the Houthi militia detained a bus driver after a phrase, "Sheikh bin Fadgham," was written on the rear window of the bus he operates to support his family. The militia claimed the driver used offensive writings and phrases on the back of his vehicle.

Sources indicated that the Houthi militia compelled the driver to confess to the act during initial interrogation and subsequently broke the rear window of the bus. The militia is reportedly continuing its investigation and has threatened punitive measures against the driver.

This incident occurs against the backdrop of a significant tribal conflict in Al Jawf Governorate, which has been ongoing for over two weeks. The conflict, known as "Matareh Al Karama," was called for by Sheikh Hamad bin Fadgham Al Hazmi following his abduction, humiliation, and torture in Houthi militia prisons. This action was reportedly linked to his support for the cause of "Mira Saddam Hussein."

Local sources stated that the Houthi militia kidnapped a bus driver after a slogan, "Sheikh bin Fadgham," was written on the rear window of the bus he operates to support his family.

The sources clarified that the Houthi militia alleged the driver used offensive writings and phrases on the back of his vehicle. They added that the militia compelled the driver to confess during initial interrogation to committing this act and subsequently broke the rear window of the bus.

Sources indicated that the Houthi militia is still investigating the driver and has threatened punitive measures against him.

It is noteworthy that the Al Jawf Governorate has been experiencing a significant tribal conflict for over two weeks, under the banner of "Matareh Al Karama." This conflict was initiated by Sheikh Hamad bin Fadgham Al Hazmi following his abduction, humiliation, and torture in Houthi militia prisons, reportedly due to his support for the cause of "Mira Saddam Hussein."

Local sources reported that Lama Qais's family and the organizing body had completed all arrangements for the ceremony, including obtaining the necessary permits from relevant authorities without prior objections. However, they were surprised by the prohibition on the day of the event, with no clear reasons provided or prior notice issued.

In an apology statement addressed to invitees and clients, the management of Saba Hotel announced the cancellation of the event, stating that the decision was due to "exceptional circumstances entirely beyond the hotel management's control," despite all necessary official procedures and permits having been fulfilled.

The hotel management expressed regret over the sudden cancellation and apologized to attendees and clients who had made bookings related to the event. They indicated that they would contact those affected to complete refund procedures and expressed hope for holding the event under better circumstances in the future.

The decision to block the tribute event has sparked widespread discontent among activists and citizens on social media platforms. Activists viewed the cancellation of an event honoring a child who achieved an Arab artistic accomplishment as a restriction on community and cultural activities, calling for respect for initiatives that celebrate Yemeni talents and honor their achievements.

Eyewitnesses and local residents reported seeing intense flames and thick plumes of smoke emanating from the vessel, locally known as "Al-Zaeema" or "Al-Sanbouq." The incident caused concern among those in the vicinity of the port quay before emergency response teams intervened.

Sources confirmed that the fire's damage was limited to the ship's structure and material components, with no reported injuries or fatalities.

The cause of the blaze remains undetermined. Authorities have initiated an investigation into the incident to ascertain the circumstances surrounding the fire.